Shareholders, managements and dividends
Graham on what owners should expect of managers and dividends, and Zweig on proxy statements, buybacks and executive pay.
FinanceGraham ch. 19About 5 min: 3 reading, 2 practiceUpdated
General education, not financial advice.
- State Graham's test for a company's dividend policy
- Check whether retained earnings have raised earnings per share
- Explain Zweig's concerns about buybacks and option pay
The Intelligent Investor: Benjamin Graham's ideas: lesson 20 of 24
- Graham ch. 1
- Investment versus speculation 4 min
- Graham ch. 2
- Inflation and the investor 4 min
- Graham ch. 3
- A century of market history 5 min
- Graham ch. 4
- The defensive investor's portfolio 4 min
- Graham ch. 5
- Defensive investors and stocks 4 min
- Graham ch. 6
- What the enterprising investor avoids 4 min
- Graham ch. 7
- What the enterprising investor does 5 min
- Graham ch. 8
- Mr. Market 5 min
- Living with fluctuations 5 min
- Graham ch. 9
- Investing in funds 5 min
- Graham ch. 10
- The investor and his advisers 4 min
- Graham ch. 11
- Security analysis for the lay investor 4 min
- Graham ch. 12
- Per-share earnings and their traps 4 min
- Graham ch. 13
- Comparing four companies 4 min
- Graham ch. 14
- The defensive investor's screen 4 min
- Graham ch. 15
- The enterprising investor's screen 7 min
- Graham ch. 16
- Convertibles and warrants 6 min
- Graham ch. 17
- Four extreme case histories 7 min
- Graham ch. 18
- Eight pairs of companies 7 min
- Graham ch. 19
- Shareholders, managements and dividends 5 min
- Graham ch. 20
- Margin of safety (1): the idea 5 min
- Margin of safety (2): in practice 7 min
- Graham appendix 1
- The superinvestors of Graham-and-Doddsville 6 min
- Graham postscript
- Graham today 7 min
Try first
You haven't learned this yet, so guess. Guessing before you read helps the explanation stick. Nothing here is scored.
Already know this? Take a 3-question check and skip ahead.
Get all three right and the lesson is marked done.
Pairs with Graham, The Intelligent Investor, revised edition with commentary by Jason Zweig (HarperBusiness, 2003), chapter 19, "Shareholders and Managements: Dividend Policy"
What it is
Shareholders as owners. Graham argued from 1934 onwards that shareholders should act like owners: be generous to managers who do well, and demand explanations when results are poor. He says questions about management are justified when results are:
- unsatisfactory in themselves,
- worse than those of similar companies, and
- the cause of a poor share price over a long period.
By his last revision he admits that shareholders had achieved almost nothing this way. Poor managements were changed mainly by takeovers: a low share price attracts buyers who can run the business better.
Dividend policy. Graham's test: shareholders should expect either
- a normal payout, around two-thirds of earnings, or
- a clear demonstration that the earnings kept in the business have produced a satisfactory rise in earnings per share.
A recognised growth company can usually show this. A mediocre company that keeps its earnings "to expand", under the same management, should give a full explanation and a convincing defence first.
Quick check
Tap an answer to check it.
A company earns 4 per share and pays 1 in dividends. What is its payout ratio?
- That is the share of earnings kept in the business
- That is earnings ÷ dividend; the payout ratio is dividend ÷ earnings
Show answer
25%. 1 ÷ 4 = 0.25. Graham's "normal" payout was about two-thirds.
Why it matters
Earnings kept in the company belong to the shareholders as much as dividends do. If they are reinvested well, earnings per share should grow; if not, the owners would have been better off with the cash.
Zweig's commentary (2003). Graham cut this chapter heavily in later editions; Zweig infers that he had given up on shareholders taking an interest. Zweig brings back his earlier arguments and adds his own:
- Read the proxy statement. It shows managers' pay, their share ownership and any deals between insiders and the company. Enron's 1999 proxy disclosed that its finance chief ran partnerships buying assets from Enron, a plain conflict of interest.
- Dividends discipline managers. He cites research finding that companies paying higher dividends went on to faster earnings growth, and that dividend increases were followed by higher profitability. In his view, paying cash out leaves managers less to waste or hoard.
- Buybacks. Buying back shares at low prices can be a good use of spare cash. But Zweig shows companies buying back at high prices mainly to offset shares issued to executives through stock options, issuing low and buying high.
- Executive pay. He suggests voting against option plans that hand managers more than 3% of the shares, and against plans not tied to lasting, superior results (for example, beating the industry average over at least five years).
Worked example
A made-up company over five years:
- Earnings per share start at 3.00. It pays 1.00 a year and keeps 2.00 a share.
- Over five years it keeps 5 × 2.00 = 10.00 a share.
- Earnings per share are now 3.20: a rise of 0.20.
The 10.00 kept back has added 0.20 a year of earnings, a return of 0.20 ÷ 10.00 = 2%. A savings account might have done better. By Graham's test, this company has not shown that keeping the money was worthwhile, and its owners have a right to ask why it did not pay more out.
Common mistake
Assuming a buyback always benefits shareholders. A buyback reduces the number of shares, so earnings per share rise. But if the company pays more than the shares are worth, or is mainly buying back shares it just issued to executives cheaply, the remaining owners lose.
Key terms
- payout ratio
- dividends ÷ earnings
- retained earnings
- earnings kept in the business instead of paid out
- buyback
- a company buying its own shares, reducing the number outstanding
- proxy statement
- the document sent to shareholders before the annual meeting, covering votes, pay and insider dealings
- stock option
- a right given to employees to buy shares at a set price
Practise the key terms
Tap a card to turn it over. 5 cards.
| Front | Back |
|---|---|
| payout ratio | dividends ÷ earnings |
| retained earnings | earnings kept in the business instead of paid out |
| buyback | a company buying its own shares, reducing the number outstanding |
| proxy statement | the document sent to shareholders before the annual meeting, covering votes, pay and insider dealings |
| stock option | a right given to employees to buy shares at a set price |
Practice
Work it through
A company earns 100 million and has 50 million shares. It spends cash buying back 5 million shares.
- 100 ÷ 50
- 50 − 5
- 100 ÷ 45 (ignoring the interest lost on the cash spent)
Quick quiz
Tap an answer to check it.
What did Graham say shareholders should expect on dividends?
- Graham accepted low payouts only with clear proof of good reinvestment
- His normal figure was around two-thirds
Show answer
About two-thirds of earnings paid out, or proof that retained earnings raised per-share earnings satisfactorily. The test applies to companies not held back by weak finances; growth companies can usually pass the second part.
By the time of his last revision, how did Graham say poor managements were usually changed?
- Graham says this had achieved practically nothing
Show answer
By takeovers, when a low share price attracted buyers. Outsiders could bid for control when the price was low.
Why did Zweig call some buybacks "sell low, buy high"?
- That would be buying low, which Zweig counts as a good use of cash
Show answer
Companies issued shares cheaply to executives through options, then bought shares back at much higher market prices. Oracle, in his example, issued shares to insiders at about 3.53 and bought back at about 18.26.
In short
- Graham: shareholders should act as owners; in practice, takeovers did more to change poor managements.
- Dividend test: about two-thirds paid out, or proof that retained earnings raised earnings per share.
- Zweig: read the proxy statement; dividends discipline managers; buybacks are good only at sensible prices; vote against option plans over 3% of shares.
Mastery check
Answer without looking back. Score 80% or more and the lesson is marked done. Your result is kept only in this browser.
Check yourself
Answer in your head first, then open the answer. Nothing is saved.
What payout did Graham describe as normal?
Show answer
About two-thirds of earnings.
A company retained 8 per share over several years, and its yearly earnings per share rose by 0.40. What return did the retained earnings make?
Show answer
5% (0.40 ÷ 8: the extra yearly earnings on the money kept).
Which document does Zweig say every owner should read?
Show answer
The proxy statement.
Further reading
- Benjamin Graham, The Intelligent Investor, revised edition with commentary by Jason Zweig (HarperBusiness, 2003), chapter 19.
- On this site: Per-share earnings and their traps and Four extreme case histories.
Finished? Mark it done to fill in your leaf on the Finance map.