Studyfern
Aa
Text size
Line spacing
Reading font
Theme
Focus mode

Home › Finance › Common-sense investing: the case for index funds

Cheat sheet

Common-sense investing: the case for index funds: cheat sheet

The summary, key terms and the trap to avoid for every lesson, in order. Print it, or read it, cover it, and say it back.

Investors as a group earn the market minus costs Costs and the market

  • Before costs, investors as a group earn the market return; trading among them moves money around but adds nothing.
  • After costs, the group must earn less, by exactly what it pays to brokers, managers, advisers and the tax collector.
  • Costs come every year and compound, like interest in reverse.
  • Judge a cost by what it takes over the whole time you hold something.
market return
the return of the whole market
zero-sum
one side's gain is another side's loss
index fund
a fund that simply holds all the shares in a market (or an index), in proportion, and keeps them
expense ratio
a fund's yearly running costs, as a % of what you hold
commission
a fee paid to a broker for each trade
Helpers
Bogle's name for brokers, managers and advisers paid by investors

Watch out: Thinking that because some investors beat others, investors as a group can beat the market. Every gain from a trade is another investor's loss. Only the Helpers are sure to come out ahead.

Where stock returns come from Bogle ch. 2

  • Market return ≈ dividend yield + earnings growth + speculative return.
  • Speculative return per year = (P/E end ÷ P/E start)^(1/years) − 1.
  • Long run: the businesses dominate. Short run: P/E swings dominate.
  • Returns boosted by a rising P/E are a weak guide to the future.
dividend yield
yearly dividends as a % of the share price
earnings growth
how fast company profits grow each year
P/E ratio
share price ÷ earnings per share: what investors pay for each 1 of earnings
investment return
dividend yield + earnings growth
speculative return
the yearly effect of a change in the P/E ratio
reversion to the mean
the tendency of unusual results to move back toward the long-run average

Watch out: Treating a rising P/E as a lasting source of return. A P/E can't rise forever: if it went from 15 to 30 in one decade, that decade gained about 7% a year from mood alone, and a later fall back to 15 would take it away again. Bogle, like many others, calls this tendency to swing back reversion to the mean.

Owning the whole market Bogle ch. 3

  • An index fund holds all the shares of an index, in proportion, and keeps them.
  • Cap-weighted: weight = company value ÷ total value.
  • Price changes don't force trades; the fund stays in step automatically.
  • Bogle: the simplest way to own all of business (Occam's razor).
index
a list of shares with a rule for weighting them
index fund
a fund that holds the shares of an index in the same proportions
market capitalisation
share price × number of shares: a company's total market value
cap-weighted
each company counts in proportion to its market value
S&P 500
an index of about 500 large U.S. companies
Occam's razor
when several solutions work, choose the simplest

Watch out: Thinking an index fund must constantly rebalance as prices move. A cap-weighted fund rebalances itself; it trades mainly when companies join or leave the index, or when money comes in or goes out.

Fund returns versus investor returns Bogle ch. 5

  • Funds report time-weighted returns; investors earn dollar-weighted returns.
  • Money arriving after good years and leaving after bad ones makes investor returns lag.
  • Bogle's 1980–2005 estimate: about 2.7 points a year.
  • Recent estimates are smaller (Morningstar: about 1.2), and some researchers argue the true timing cost is much smaller still.
time-weighted return
the fund's return per share, as if no money came in or went out
dollar-weighted return
the return on the money investors actually had in, given when they added and withdrew it
investor return
another name for the dollar-weighted return of a fund's investors as a group
performance chasing
buying what has recently done well

Watch out: Assuming you earned the return in a fund's advert or fact sheet. That figure is for money that stayed put the whole time. If you added or withdrew money along the way, your own return can be quite different. Some brokers and fund companies show a personal (dollar-weighted) return on statements.

Taxes are costs too Bogle ch. 6

  • Selling at a profit realises gains, which may be taxed that year.
  • High turnover → more realised gains → bigger yearly tax bills.
  • Paying tax later lets the money keep compounding.
  • Rules depend on the country and account: this lesson teaches the idea, not any country's law.
capital gain
the profit when something is sold for more than it cost
realised gain
a gain that has been locked in by selling (often taxable)
turnover
how much of a fund's portfolio is traded in a year
tax-efficient
arranged so that as little tax as possible is due before you sell
taxable account
an account where gains and income are taxed as they arise

Watch out: Comparing funds only on their pre-tax returns when the money is in a taxable account. A fund that trades heavily can hand you a tax bill each year that its advertised return doesn't show. (Bogle also notes a twist: an index fund pays out more of its dividends, because its low costs eat less of them, so it can look less tax-efficient on dividends while being more tax-efficient overall.)

When future returns are lower Bogle ch. 7

  • Rough expected return ≈ dividend yield + earnings growth + P/E change per year.
  • Bogle's 2007 estimate: about 7%. The actual 2007–2016 return: about 6.9%, through a severe crash.
  • The same costs take a larger share of a lower return.
  • A forecast states assumptions; it is not a promise.
expected return
a reasoned estimate of a future average return, never a promise
assumption
an input you choose, such as the future P/E
sensitivity
how much the answer changes when an assumption changes
sequence
the order of good and bad years along the way

Watch out: Treating the past few decades' return as the expected future return. If part of a past return came from a rising P/E, it can't simply be repeated: the P/E would have to keep rising forever.

Why past winners rarely repeat Bogle ch. 8–9

  • Records that leave out closed funds look better than reality (survivorship bias).
  • Unusual results tend to fade (reversion to the mean).
  • A big gain followed by a big loss can leave almost nothing: 1.55 × 0.66 ≈ 1.02.
  • Current SPIVA data: most active funds trail their index over long periods, and top performers rarely stay on top.
survivorship bias
the distortion when failed funds drop out of the record
reversion to the mean
the tendency of unusual results to move back toward the average
persistence
whether a fund's good performance continues
star rating
a score based on a fund's past risk-adjusted returns

Watch out: Choosing a fund because it has the best record of the last few years. Bogle reports that a portfolio switching into Morningstar's 5-star funds earned 6.9% a year over 1994–2004, against 11.0% for the total stock market (a study by Mark Hulbert). Ratings describe what has happened; Bogle reports they were poor predictors over 1994–2004.

Is advice worth paying for? Costs and the market

  • Advisers can help with planning, taxes and behaviour; neither Bogle nor Graham expects them to beat the market reliably.
  • Commission and fee-only pay create different conflicts; both are costs.
  • A 1% yearly fee can take around 30% of 30 years' gains.
  • Help is most worth having after big losses, budget trouble, chaotic portfolios or big life changes. Trust, then verify.
commission
pay an adviser receives from a product provider for a sale
fee-only adviser
an adviser paid only by the client, not by product providers
conflict of interest
when an adviser's pay depends on what they recommend
advice fee
a yearly charge, often a % of the money advised on
investment counsel
a professional adviser paid a fee to manage or advise on investments
due diligence
checking someone's background before trusting them

Watch out: Treating a recommendation as free. If an adviser is paid by commission, the product price includes their pay; if fee-only, it's on your statement. Either way, ask how much it is in money per year, and what you get for it.

Costs go on forever Bogle ch. 11–12

  • Costs = expense ratio + trading costs, plus any sales charges.
  • Bogle's rule of thumb: trading costs ≈ 1% of the turnover rate.
  • Before costs, funds earn similar returns; after costs, cheap funds tend to come out ahead.
  • Costs are the one thing you can know in advance.
expense ratio
yearly running costs as a % of your money
sales charge (load)
a one-off charge on buying or selling
trading costs
costs of the fund's own buying and selling, not in the expense ratio
turnover
how much of the portfolio is traded in a year
all-in cost
Bogle's term: expense ratio + trading costs (sales charges come on top)

Watch out: Looking only at the expense ratio. A fund with a low expense ratio but very high turnover, or a big sales charge, may not be cheap at all. Add up all three.

Bonds and money-market funds Bogle ch. 13

  • Bond and money-market returns come mainly from interest, set by the market.
  • Similar funds earn similar returns before costs; costs decide most of the difference after.
  • A fee takes a bigger share of a small yield: 1% of a 4% yield is a quarter of it.
  • Higher yield usually means more risk: longer maturities or weaker borrowers.
bond
a loan that pays interest and is repaid at maturity
maturity
the date a bond is repaid
yield
the yearly income from a bond or fund, as a % of its price
credit quality
how likely the borrower is to pay; lower quality pays more but risks default
money-market fund
a fund of very short-term, high-quality loans

Watch out: Choosing a bond fund for its higher yield without asking why it's higher. A higher yield often means longer bonds or weaker borrowers: more risk, not a better manager. Bogle also warns against sales charges on bond funds: a 5% charge can wipe out a whole year's interest.

New indexes and ETFs Bogle ch. 14–15

  • New "smart" indexes depart from the market portfolio, so Bogle treats them as active strategies.
  • Back-tests are chosen with hindsight and can mislead.
  • ETFs are a vehicle: broad and held can match a classic index fund; narrow and traded can't.
  • Researchers still debate whether factor tilts will keep paying.
ETF
exchange-traded fund: a fund whose shares trade on an exchange during the day
fundamental index
an index weighted by measures like sales or dividends, not market value
factor ("smart beta")
a trait such as value, size or momentum that a strategy tilts toward
back-test
applying a rule to past data to see how it would have done
data mining
searching past data until something looks good, which may not last

Watch out: Assuming "index" means "low cost and the whole market". An index can be narrow, frequently changed, or built to follow an active strategy. Check what it holds, how often it trades, and what it costs.

Graham, the arithmetic, and a plan Bogle ch. 16–18

  • Graham: most investors should be defensive, simple and diversified.
  • Bogle's arithmetic: returns come from businesses; costs and behaviour decide what investors keep.
  • His plan: broad low-cost index funds, stay the course, at most a small "funny money" account.
  • The arithmetic applies to everyone; the plan is one investor's reasoned choice.
defensive investor
Graham's term for someone who invests simply and avoids speculation
the relentless rules of humble arithmetic
Bogle's phrase for: returns minus costs equals what investors keep
serious money / funny money
Bogle's split between long-term savings and a small amount for speculation
stay the course
keep to a sensible plan through good and bad markets
asset allocation
how money is divided between stocks, bonds and cash

Watch out: Treating any one investor's rule of thumb as a rule for you. "Bonds equal to your age" or "5% for fun" are Bogle's personal guides, offered with his own caveats. The arithmetic is general; the plan is personal.